5 Powerful Insights into Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration in Asia: Vietnam’s Role in a Connected Region

  

The Changing Face of Cross-Border Disputes

In today’s borderless economy, trade and investment move faster than regulation. Contracts stretch across Asia. When conflicts arise, national courts often struggle to keep pace and traditional litigation would take long. The question of how to maintain fairness, enforceability, and efficiency across different jurisdictions leads naturally to one solution: dispute resolution through arbitration.

For decades, arbitration was seen as the tool of large multinationals. Now it has become the language of trust in Asia. Whether a manufacturing agreement, a trading contract, or a technology transfer, parties increasingly rely on arbitration to settle disputes privately, neutrally, and predictably.

For Vietnam, this transformation matters deeply. The country’s rising participation in regional trade under local and international frameworks means cross-border disputes are inevitable. Dispute resolution through arbitration offers a mechanism that fits both its reform trajectory and the region’s business expectations.

5 Powerful Insights into Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration in Asia

Why Arbitration Has Become the Standard

The attraction of dispute resolution through arbitration lies in three simple promises: neutrality, enforceability, and flexibility.

Neutrality: Arbitration allows parties from different countries to avoid the perception of home court bias. This neutrality is essential when investors from foreign countries partner with firms in Vietnam or other ASEAN countries.

Enforceability: The New York Convention ensures that arbitral awards are recognized in more than 160 countries. Across Asia, governments including Vietnam’s have embraced this framework, making enforcement of arbitral decisions more predictable than court judgments.

Flexibility: Arbitration allows parties to choose seat of arbitration, governing law of contract, governing law of the arbitration agreement, language, and procedures. In a region where legal traditions differ, this flexibility enables commerce to continue without friction.

In short, dispute resolution through arbitration is not simply a legal mechanism; it is the glue holding together Asia’s increasingly complex commercial web.

How Vietnam Aligns Within Asia’s Arbitration Landscape

Imagine Asia as a network of interconnected dispute resolution corridors which developed countries offer procedural efficiency or invest in modern arbitration frameworks or expands its cross-border cooperation; and Southeast Asian nations, including Vietnam, align their laws to international standards.

Vietnam is discussing on revising its Law on Commercial Arbitration to catch up international arbitration standard i.e., UNCITRAL Model Law to certain level depending on its specific unique situation.

Vietnam’s role is gathering momentum to harmonize with international standards and move toward direction to ensure its legal system supports dispute resolution through arbitration with predictability and fairness.

This alignment reflects Vietnam’s commitment to integration, transparency, and investor confidence.

Across Asia, a convergence is taking shape:

• Governments are updating arbitration laws to mirror UNCITRAL principles.
• Courts are increasingly supportive of arbitration agreements and enforcement.
• Regional businesses now insert dispute resolution through arbitration clauses in contracts as a matter of standard risk management.

This ecosystem of mutual recognition is to makes Asia a dynamic arbitration region and Vietnam an essential participant in its evolution.

Legal and Practical Realities of Cross-Border Arbitration

While the concept is elegant, the practice of dispute resolution through arbitration still faces challenges. Understanding these helps businesses prepare smarter contracts and avoid procedural pitfalls.

Choice of Seat and Governing Law

Selecting a neutral seat of arbitration is critical. The seat determines which national law governs procedural issues and how courts may intervene. For Vietnam related contracts, businesses often look to nearby Asian jurisdictions whose arbitration laws are internationally recognized. The goal is not avoidance, but complementarity ensuring enforceability both in Vietnam and abroad.

Recognition of Foreign Arbitral Awards

Even with the New York Convention, enforcement standards vary. Courts may review awards for public policy violations or procedural defects. Vietnam’s courts increasingly demonstrate restraint and consistency, signaling alignment with regional practices.

Cultural and Linguistic Gaps

In dispute resolution through arbitration, communication matters. Misunderstandings about language, document production, or witness examination can affect fairness. Parties should specify language, translation procedures, and evidence standards clearly in their arbitration clauses.

Public Policy and Arbitrability

Certain matters such as land, employment, consumer rights may be non-arbitrable in some Asian jurisdictions including Vietnam. Understanding these boundaries before drafting arbitration clauses prevents later surprises.

Technology and Virtual Hearings

The pandemic accelerated digital transformation. Many Asian arbitrations now take place entirely online. Vietnam and its neighbors are adapting to electronic submissions, e-signatures, and virtual hearings, trends that make dispute resolution through arbitration faster and more cost-effective.

Step-by-Step Guide to Using Arbitration in Cross-Border Transactions

Businesses and investors across Asia can follow these practical steps to incorporate dispute resolution through arbitration effectively:

Step 1: Map Your Contractual Relationships

Identify which agreements involve foreign parties or multi-jurisdictional obligations. Any cross-border contract is a candidate for arbitration because litigation may be slow or unenforceable abroad.

Step 2: Draft a Clear Arbitration Clause

Arbitration clause should include details on:

• The agreement to arbitrate
• The seat and governing law
• The language
• Number of arbitrators and method of appointment
• Scope i.e. all disputes arising out of or relating to the contract

Step 3: Choose a Neutral Seat

Selecting a neutral Asian seat encourages mutual trust. The seat determines the level of court support and procedural rules. Neutrality ensures no party feels disadvantaged.

Step 4: Decide on Governing Law

Governing law affects interpretation of rights and obligations. Choose one consistent with commercial expectations, not necessarily the law of either party’s home country.

Step 5: Anticipate Enforcement

Ensure that the jurisdictions of both parties are signatories to the New York Convention so arbitral awards can be recognized and enforced.

Step 6: Prepare for Procedure and Evidence

Decide early on rules for discovery, witness statements, and electronic submissions. Agree on digital confidentiality standards when sharing data across borders.

Step 7: Engage Arbitration Counsel

Counsels with training in cross-border dispute resolution through arbitration can bridge cultural and procedural gaps, ensuring the process runs smoothly.

Step 8: Use Mediation as a Pre-Arbitration Step

Many Asian contracts now include a tiered clause: negotiation, mediation, arbitration. This approach preserves relationships and can reduce cost.

Step 9: Manage Costs and Timelines

Arbitration can be more efficient than court litigation, but it requires careful management. Set realistic timeframes and budgeting expectations from the start.

Step 10: Enforce and Comply

Once an award is rendered, prompt compliance protects reputation and future business opportunities.

By following these steps, companies operating between Vietnam and other Asian economies can navigate dispute resolution through arbitration confidently and efficiently.

The Future of Arbitration in a Connected Asia

The future of dispute resolution through arbitration in Asia is defined not by rivalry but by interconnection. The region’s legal systems are learning from one another, blending civil and common law traditions, and adopting international best practices.

For Vietnam, integration means harmonizing procedures, recognizing regional awards, and nurturing professionals skilled in transnational law. The goal is to make arbitration not an exception, but a standard part of doing business in Asia.

Looking ahead:

• Digitalization will reduce the cost and time of arbitral proceedings.
• Cross-border cooperation among Asian courts will enhance enforcement reliability.
• Cultural diversity will enrich, not complicate, arbitral practice as Asian lawyers and arbitrators gain global prominence.

In this ecosystem, Vietnam stands as a practical bridge, connecting Southeast Asian dynamism with East Asian maturity, grounded in a shared commitment to fair and effective dispute resolution through arbitration.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Why is arbitration preferred for cross-border disputes in Asia?

Because it provides neutrality, confidentiality, and enforceability across national borders. With diverse legal systems in Asia, dispute resolution through arbitration ensures parties can rely on a predictable process and outcome.

Can arbitration awards be enforced in Vietnam and other Asian countries?

Yes. Most Asian jurisdictions, including Vietnam, are parties to the New York Convention, which facilitates recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

Is arbitration more expensive than litigation?

It depends on case complexity and counsel fees. While arbitration may seem costly initially, it often saves time and reduces long-term uncertainty, key in cross-border dispute resolution through arbitration.

What types of disputes are suitable for arbitration?

Commercial, technology, shipping, and investment disputes are typical.

How can Vietnamese companies prepare for arbitration?

By drafting precise arbitration clauses, training in procedural awareness, and engaging professionals experienced in dispute resolution through arbitration across Asia.

Are virtual hearings accepted in Asia?

Yes. Post-pandemic, most jurisdictions now recognize virtual hearings and electronic filings as valid, further improving access to dispute resolution through arbitration.

How does arbitration benefit foreign investors in Vietnam?

It assures that disputes can be settled impartially and enforced internationally, making dispute resolution through arbitration a key factor in investor confidence.

Trust Beyond Borders

Asia’s rise is not only about trade volume but about legal maturity. As cross-border commerce expands, dispute resolution through arbitration has become the region’s unifying language of trust.

Vietnam, positioned at the heart of ASEAN and engaged with all major Asian economies, represents this quiet transformation. It neither competes for dominance nor isolates itself, it aligns, harmonizes, and participates.

Through consistent reform, openness to global practices, and recognition of arbitral awards, Vietnam contributes to a shared regional goal, which is a future where disputes are resolved with fairness, efficiency, and mutual respect.

In that future, dispute resolution through arbitration will remain not just a mechanism of law, but a symbol of Asia’s collective commercial confidence.

About ANT Lawyers, a Law Firm in Vietnam

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers has lawyers in Ho Chi Minh city, Hanoi,  and Danang, and will help customers in doing business in Vietnam.

Source: https://antlawyers.vn/library/dispute-resolution-through-arbitration.html

7 Reasons Why Technology Disputes in Asia Matter for Vietnam’s Digital Economy

  Cross border data flow is the fuel of Asia’s digital economy and the foundation for Vietnam’s long term digital success.

Data has become Asia’s most valuable infrastructure. Every algorithm, transaction, and online service depends on it. As information moves across borders, laws collide. Different rules on privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence (AI) are creating a new generation of technology disputes in Asia.

For Vietnam one of the region’s fastest-growing digital markets, these disputes are not distant issues. They directly influence how the Vietnam digital economy develops, attracts investors, and builds public trust. The future of growth lies not only in connectivity, but in how well countries manage the legal flow of data.

7 Reasons Why Technology Disputes in Asia Matter for Vietnam’s Digital Economy

The Regional Movements

Across Asia, governments are racing to regulate the digital world.

Some countries enforce strict data export controls and national security reviews. Others promote innovation under accountable, flexible privacy rules. While some are rewriting its data protection framework to more localization.

These differences create overlapping obligations that often lead to technology disputes in Asia from access to cloud stored data to disagreements over algorithmic bias or cyber breach liability.

For foreign companies operating regionally including Vietnam, the challenge is how to maintain data protection in Vietnam while exchanging data lawfully with partners abroad.

Vietnam’s Legal Readiness

Digital Ambition

Vietnam’s National Digital Transformation Program and AI Strategy to 2030 target a digital-economy contribution of 30 percent of GDP. Achieving that goal requires seamless, trusted cross-border data flow the backbone of fintech, logistics, and online services.

Fragmentation Leads to Disputes

When laws differ, conflict follows. A Vietnamese company storing data on a regional cloud may face privacy obligations from two or three countries at once. If an AI partner misuses customer data, both firms may face enforcement from different regulators. Such scenarios drive the rise of technology disputes in Asia, increasing legal uncertainty and cost.

Vietnam’s Direction of Reform

Vietnam’s Law on Data 2024 establishes the national framework for managing, sharing, and exploiting all forms of data, while the upcoming Personal Data Protection Law will focus on individual privacy and cross-border data transfers. Together with the Science, Technology and Innovation Law, which introduces sandboxes for emerging technologies, and the Cybersecurity Law, which protects national networks, these statutes form the backbone of Vietnam’s trusted data governance, balancing control with openness.

Why This Acceleration Matters for Vietnam

Vietnam’s rush to enact data, AI, cybersecurity, and virtual-asset laws is deliberate. Several forces are driving it:

Economic Transformation: The country is moving from manufacturing to a Vietnam digital economy centered on data and services. Growth now depends on legal clarity for data and AI.

Regional Obligations: Under ASEAN, RCEP, and CPTPP agreements, Vietnam must align its digital trade standards with regional partners to stay competitive.

Investor Confidence: Foreign investors demand clear compliance frameworks before transferring or processing data in Vietnam.

Dispute Prevention: Early regulation helps avoid the costly wave of technology disputes in Asia seen elsewhere.

Global Positioning: Amid geopolitical tech tensions, Vietnam can present itself as a neutral, trusted data hub bridging East and West.

Timing: Most new laws will take effect around 2025 and 2026, aligning with global shifts in digital supply chain investment.

Vietnam is not just reacting to technology, it is building legal trust as an economic asset.

International Arbitration As A Practical Solution

Because data and AI transactions span multiple countries, court litigation can be slow, public, and uncertain. Businesses increasingly prefer arbitration in a neutral seat renowned for efficiency, confidentiality, and enforceability under the New York Convention.

There is a need to use an arbitration seat country which promote arbitration to ensure:

• Expert panels familiar with digital technology evidence,
• Procedures that protect sensitive data, and
• Awards enforceable across most Asian jurisdictions.

For enterprises trading or partnering regionally including Vietnam, such clauses are a proven safeguard against jurisdictional conflict and rising technology disputes in Asia.

Step-by-Step Guide on How To Reduce Technology Dispute Risks

Reducing exposure to technology disputes in Asia requires more than just good intentions. It calls for disciplined preparation and proactive compliance. Vietnamese companies expanding their digital activities can follow these seven practical steps to stay ahead of legal and regulatory risks.

Step 1: Map your data flow.
Begin by identifying where customer, employee, and operational data is stored, processed, and transferred. Many Vietnamese firms use regional or global cloud services without realizing that each data location may trigger a different national law. Mapping your data flow helps clarify which jurisdictions, and therefore which obligations apply to your business.

Step 2: Review all technology and cloud contracts.
Every agreement that involves technology, AI, or data sharing should clearly specify the governing law and a neutral arbitration seat. Doing so prevents confusion about which court has authority and ensures that disputes are resolved efficiently.

Step 3: Adopt internal data policies.
Internal rules should align with Vietnam’s emerging Personal Data Protection Law and the broader Law on Data. These policies demonstrate to regulators and partners that your organization values compliance, transparency, and trust, critical ingredients for long-term growth in the Vietnam digital economy.

Step 4: Audit your third-party vendors.
Digital supply chains are only as strong as their weakest link. Verify that external partners, especially those handling data or AI functions, follow equivalent privacy and cybersecurity standards. Auditing vendors reduces shared liability and strengthens your overall data governance framework.

Step 5: Train employees on AI ethics and data risk.
Technology compliance is not only a legal matter, it is a people matter. Regular training enables staff to recognize privacy risks, improper data collection, or algorithmic bias before they escalate into costly disputes. Early awareness is the most effective safeguard against internal data incidents.

Step 6: Engage legal counsel early.
Consult lawyers familiar with both Vietnam’s technology regulations and regional data frameworks before launching new products or partnerships. Early advice can identify potential conflicts, prevent regulatory breaches, and save significant resources that would otherwise be spent on dispute resolution.

Step 7: Monitor regional digital policy developments.
Asia’s legal landscape is evolving rapidly. Keep an eye on ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025, and national updates in partner markets. Staying informed allows companies in Vietnam to adapt compliance programs quickly and avoid unexpected exposure to new legal requirements.

Taken together, these steps provide a structured roadmap for Vietnamese businesses to manage technology related risk. By embedding compliance into operations, companies not only prevent technology disputes but also build the credibility and trust that underpin Vietnam’s role in the regional digital economy.

The digital economy is built on data, and data depends on trust. When information moves freely and safely, innovation accelerates. When it is blocked or mishandled, technology disputes multiply.  Vietnam’s strategy of modernizing data protection in Vietnam, aligning with ASEAN standards, and encouraging arbitration for cross-border contracts positions it for sustainable digital growth.

The lesson is that economic competitiveness now depends as much on legal readiness as on technology itself.

Frequently Asked Questions on Technology Disputes in Asia

Q1. Why are Technology Disputes in Asia rising?
Because countries regulate data and AI differently. Companies operating regionally face conflicting obligations on storage, transfer, and consent.

Q2. How do such disputes affect the Vietnam digital economy?
They slow cross border projects, raise compliance costs, and discourage foreign digital investment.

Q3. What role does the Personal Data Protection Law play?
It defines how personal data is collected, stored, and transferred abroad, improving data protection in Vietnam and aligning with regional norms.

Q4. Why is arbitration in developed and neutral country preferred?
It offers neutrality, confidentiality, expert arbitrators, and enforceable awards under the New York Convention, ideal for complex tech disputes.

Q5. Can Vietnamese companies include foreign arbitration clauses?
Yes. Parties may freely agree to arbitrate outside Vietnam, provided the contract clearly states the seat of arbitration and governing law.

Q6. How can harmonized data rules reduce disputes?
When countries share compatible standards, companies face fewer conflicting requirements, lowering risks of involving in technology disputes in Asia overall.

About ANT Lawyers, a Law Firm in Vietnam

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers has lawyers in Ho Chi Minh city, Hanoi,  and Danang, and will help customers in doing business in Vietnam.

Source: https://antlawyers.vn/update/technology-disputes-in-asia-and-vietnam.html

Hanoi Convention on Cybercrime: 7 Realities on Geopolitics, Industry Opinions

  

Executive Summary

From October 25-26th, 2025, the Hanoi convention on cybercrime opens for signature in Hanoi, then remains open at UN Headquarters until  December 31st, 2026. Article 64 names Hanoi into the treaty’s opening clause creating an enduring visibility for Vietnam.

In here, we will discuss what the Hanoi convention on cybercrime does, why Hanoi is a neutral and practical venue, and opinions from industry.

In particular, no matter what, this signing event is a win for Vietnam which happens to be in the crossroad of big powers.  On the legal terms, there are some critics from stakeholders, that the languages used in the Hanoi convention appear to broaden the languages used in Budapest’s convention, which poses risks in several aspects.  One also should take note Vietnam did not sign the Budapest convention.  Cambodia did not sign the Budapest convention.  Some big powers did not.  

What the Convention Actually Does

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime establishes a common framework to address computer related offenses and to streamline cross border e-evidence. In short, it seeks to make cooperation faster and more predictable under the following areas.

Offenses: illegal access, illegal interception, data or system interference, computer-related fraud, child sexual exploitation materials, and misuse of devices, tools.

Procedural measures: expedited preservation orders, production, search, seizure of electronic evidence, real-time collection in defined scenarios, and subscriber information mechanisms.

International cooperation: 24/7 points of contact, mutual assistance, joint investigations, extradition options, and capacity building.

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime enters into force 90 days after the 40th ratification. Signature signals intent and ratification is what makes it binding. Until then, states and companies will continue to rely on the Budapest framework, mutual legal assistance in parallel.

Press Conference on the Signing of the Convention on Combating Cybercrime

Why Hanoi?

The text’s Article 64 specifies that the treaty opens for signature in Hanoi on October 25-26th, 2025 before moving to New York. That clause permanently associates the Hanoi convention on cybercrime with Vietnam’s capital.

Why Hanoi makes legal and practical sense

Neutral position: Hanoi sits between major blocs, offering a venue that many can accept.

ASEAN relevance: Southeast Asia is a dynamic digital market and a frequent target of cybercrime; hosting here matches need with visibility.

Operational readiness: Vietnam has the logistics to host and the incentive to modernize cooperation tools, making the Hanoi convention on cybercrime a credible platform for regional engagement.

Why Vietnam Surprises and is Still Logical

Vietnam has not typically been at the front of cross border cyber legal norm setting. The Hanoi convention on cybercrime puts Vietnam in a convening role, which fits today’s context that Vietnam is a neutral venue in a fast growing region that needs practical, lawful cooperation against cyber threats.

Parallel Tracks: Budapest vs the Hanoi Convention

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime may run alongside the Budapest Convention for some time. If some large economies delay or decline ratification, counsel should expect dual rails for cross-border e-evidence:

Budapest channel on one side;

Hanoi convention on cybercrime procedures on the other.

Industry Concerns and How to Address Them in Implementation

A balanced view of the Hanoi convention on cybercrime recognizes concerns voiced by technology companies and security practitioners:

Good-faith security testing: Broad drafting could chill vulnerability disclosure, bug bounty work, and penetration testing.

Compelled technical assistance: Providers seek clearer guardrails so that any request has a clear legal basis, specific scope, time bound limits, and where required, court oversight.

Transparency and auditability: Companies need predictable preservation steps, logs of handling, and confidentiality periods that align with law.

How About Dispute Settlement

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime follows the familiar, stepped model for interstate disagreements about interpretation or application:

Consultation and negotiation first;

Other peaceful means, which can naturally include mediation or conciliation;

Arbitration by agreement between the states concerned; and

If still unresolved, potential referral to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) under its Statute.

For commercial stakeholders, remember that most real world frictions are contractual agreement on cloud contract, data processing, incident timelines which are typically governed by international commercial arbitration under selected arbitration centers’ rules, with the agreement on law of seat and law of arbitration agreement. Building the appropriate arbitration clauses into contracts complements the state-to-state track of the Hanoi convention on cybercrime and keeps business disputes out of diplomatic channels.

Conclusion

The Hanoi convention on cybercrime places Vietnam in a practical convening role at a time when cross-border investigations need clear, lawful channels. Article 64 ensures the Hanoi opening is written into the treaty’s origin. The durable value for Vietnam and for companies will come from precise implementation: measured offense definitions, court-supervised procedures where required, predictable mutual assistance, and contract-level arbitration tools for operational disputes.

About ANT Lawyers, a Law Firm in Vietnam

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers has lawyers in Ho Chi Minh city, Hanoi,  and Danang, and will help customers in doing business in Vietnam.

Source: https://antlawyers.vn/update/hanoi-convention-on-cybercrime.html

How to Answer AD23 Anti-Dumping Investigation Questionnaire: What Exporters Must Know Before November 5th, 2025

  

The Next Stage in Vietnam’s Tile Case

On September 29, 2025, the Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam (TRAV) released the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire to selected exporters. This marks the shift from the initial sampling stage to the full investigation stage in the tile case against India. The decisive deadline is clear, that all responses must be filed by November 5, 2025 (Hanoi time).

For sampled exporters, this questionnaire is the gateway to determining individual duty margins. For non-sampled exporters, the outcome depends on whether they requested separate treatment on time and how TRAV applies the law.

Current Status of the Investigation

August 18, 2025: MOIT initiated the anti-dumping case on Indian tiles

August 25, 2025: TRAV issued the sampling questionnaire

September 19, 2025: TRAV published the sampling results of the exporters to be reviewed.

September 29, 2025: TRAV distributed the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire to these sampled exporters.

Who Must Respond and By When

Sampled exporters must submit full responses to the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire by November 5, 2025.

Voluntary respondents who requested inclusion by September 27 are not guaranteed full questionnaires. TRAV has confirmed that no new exporters will be added at this stage.

Non-sampled but cooperative exporters will not receive the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire but will instead be assigned a weighted-average duty margin based on sampled results.

Non-cooperative exporters will face the “all others” rate, often the highest duty applied.

How to Answer AD23 Anti-Dumping Investigation Questionnaire?

The questionnaire is a multi-part document requiring disclosure across operations, sales, and costs.

To answer the anti-dumping investigation questionnaire, pay attention to the key features that include:

Separate responses for each company: Every exporter and each affiliated company involved in producing or trading the investigated tiles must complete the questionnaire independently. If one company in a group fails to cooperate, TRAV can apply the dumping margin to the entire group.

Comprehensive sections, which is divided into major parts:

• General company information
• Data on the investigated goods and production
•  Export sales to Vietnam and other markets
• Domestic sales in India
• Cost of production
• Purchase and resale prices
• Computerized data files
• Reconciliation tables ensuring numbers tie to audited accounts

Trading company obligations: Non-affiliated trading houses exporting tiles to Vietnam must file their own responses and coordinate with manufacturers to complete the data.

Verification clause: Each company must sign a confirmation that information is accurate, with the understanding that TRAV will conduct on-site verification visits at offices and plants.

Translation and confidentiality: Submissions must be filed in Vietnamese, with both confidential and public versions, and the public version must contain summaries.

This structure makes clear why the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire requires close cooperation between exporters, affiliated companies, trading houses, accountants, and legal counsels in Vietnam and India.

Step by Step Guide for Submission of Answers to AD23 Anti-dumping Investigation Questionnaire

Step by Step Guide for Submission of Answers to AD23 Anti-dumping Investigation Questionnaire

Steps to take to comply with the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire:

Step 1: File responses through TRAV ONLINE.

Step 2: Submit a signed hard copy confirmation page and a USB with all files.

Step 3: Provide both confidential and public versions with meaningful summaries.

Step 4: Ensure Vietnamese translations are accurate and consistent.

What Happens Next

After November 5, TRAV will:

Review questionnaire responses for accuracy.

Conduct on-site verification visits at company offices and plants.

Issue a preliminary decision, possibly including provisional duties.

Conclude with a final decision within 12–18 months of initiation.

Handling the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire is only the first step in a long process that requires sustained cooperation and expert guidance.

Key Q&A for Exporters

Can voluntary respondents still be added to the sampling list?

No. TRAV finalized the list on September 19. Companies that requested inclusion by September 27 but were not selected will not be issued the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire.

If a voluntary respondent submits anyway, will TRAV accept it?

No. Only sampled exporters can file the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire. Non-sampled exporters receive average duty rates instead.

What if a company filed the sampling form but does not submit the full questionnaire?

It will be treated as non-cooperative and assigned the “all others” duty, which is usually much higher.

What is in the full questionnaire?

The Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire covers export sales to Vietnam, domestic sales in India, cost of production, financials, and corporate structures.

How important are translations?

Essential. TRAV requires submissions in Vietnamese.

How long will the case last?

Between 12–18 months, including verification visits and determinations.

Why engage local counsel?

Local lawyers and consultants are vital to:

• Ensure proper translation of the Vietnam AD23 anti-dumping investigation questionnaire.
• Liaise with TRAV officers during verification.
• Prepare compliant public versions.
• Safeguard exporters’ rights over a lengthy process.

About ANT Lawyers, a Law Firm in Vietnam

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers has lawyers in Ho Chi Minh city, Hanoi,  and Danang, and will help customers in doing business in Vietnam.

Source: https://antlawyers.vn/update/ad23-anti-dumping-investigation-questionnaire.html